• NCAA talks expanding hoops tourney to 72 or 76

 #95466  by FU Hoopla
 Thu Dec 12, 2024 12:09 pm
NCAA president Charlie Baker is "bullish" on the prospect of the NCAA basketball tournaments expanding to 72 or 76 teams in the near future.

Baker said he has been having productive conversations with television partners and members of the NCAA's basketball committees on expanding from the current 68-team bracket. He said the NCAA would have to make a decision to move forward by the end of this year's March Madness in order to implement the expanded field for the 2026 tournament.

He said the tournament is unlikely to grow any bigger than 76 because of the limited window they have to schedule games between the time when conference championships end and coverage of the Masters begins.

"I'm bullish on the conversations we've had about going to 72 or 76, and I think the committees are willing to consider that, but I don't think it's going to be anything beyond that," Baker said after speaking about the future of the NCAA at a conference hosted by Sports Business Journal.

The NCAA's basketball committees presented proposals to expand the tournament last June after several major conferences and leaders such as SEC commissioner Greg Sankey publicly pushed to create more at-large bids for their schools.

"We are giving away highly competitive opportunities for automatic qualifiers [from smaller leagues], and I think that pressure is going to rise as we have more competitive basketball leagues at the top end because of expansion," Sankey told ESPN last March.

Baker told reporters his focus in the coming year is to implement changes made to the NCAA through the pending, industry-shifting antitrust settlement that will allow schools to start paying players directly. He said he expects to begin working in January on the details of a system that will provide more freedom for the major conferences to form rules that are better suited to their economic reality.

When asked if the NCAA's experience in organizing March Madness could provide any help to the College Football Playoff -- which is not operated by the NCAA -- in its selection process, Baker said that some disappointment in the selection process is inevitable.

"There are always going to be people who thought it worked exactly the way it should and people who think otherwise," Baker said.

He added that one of the main differences between the two selection processes for the two tournaments is the College Football Playoff's weekly release of new rankings during the second half of the regular season. The NCAA selection committee shares limited ranking information only once before making its final decisions about tournament seeding.

"I can't figure out in my own head if it generates excitement and is interesting to people or if it just makes people crazy as the season goes on to have this thing constantly move," Baker said.
 #95467  by FU Hoopla
 Thu Dec 12, 2024 12:10 pm
Thoughts?

Do we think this will help the good Mid-Majors like Furman down the line (even if it gets 1 or 2 an at-large it helps)

Or do we think they will still just give us (Mid-Majors) 'the shaft' like always? lol
 #95470  by FU Hoopla
 Thu Dec 12, 2024 12:19 pm
An interesting thought.........

18% of all FCS Football schools make the playoffs every year (24 of 129)

It seems that DI Basketball is headed toward having nearly 400 members in the future, so 72 of 400 is also 18%
 #95475  by apaladin
 Thu Dec 12, 2024 2:42 pm
FU Hoopla wrote:
Thu Dec 12, 2024 12:10 pm
Thoughts?

Do we think this will help the good Mid-Majors like Furman down the line (even if it gets 1 or 2 an at-large it helps)

Or do we think they will still just give us (Mid-Majors) 'the shaft' like always? lol
No it won’t help mid-majors just the big boys, any team with a .500 record from those conferences has a good chance. More teams means more money for the big boys. That’s why you rarely see them give an at-large to a deserving non P4.
They give it to a team that is under .500 in their conference. They are not in business to give away a bid(money).
Davemeister liked this
 #95476  by FU Hoopla
 Thu Dec 12, 2024 3:16 pm
apaladin wrote:
Thu Dec 12, 2024 2:42 pm
FU Hoopla wrote:
Thu Dec 12, 2024 12:10 pm
Thoughts?

Do we think this will help the good Mid-Majors like Furman down the line (even if it gets 1 or 2 an at-large it helps)

Or do we think they will still just give us (Mid-Majors) 'the shaft' like always? lol
No it won’t help mid-majors just the big boys, any team with a .500 record from those conferences has a good chance. More teams means more money for the big boys. That’s why you rarely see them give an at-large to a deserving non P4.
They give it to a team that is under .500 in their conference. They are not in business to give away a bid(money).


So you think Zero of the 4 to 8 new bids will go to mid-majors, ever?

Recent Topics

User avatar Belichick

by FUBeAR

Thu Dec 12, 2024 5:02 pm

User avatar J P Pegues

by Davemeister

Thu Dec 12, 2024 3:32 pm

User avatar vs. SC State (Dec. 14th)

by FU Hoopla

Thu Dec 12, 2024 3:27 pm

User avatar vs. Princeton (Dec. 7th)

by FU Hoopla

Thu Dec 12, 2024 3:27 pm

Twitter

About Us

GoPaladins.com is the latest iteration of The Unofficial Furman Football Page. Launched in August of 1996, The UFFP welcomes fans of all FCS football teams - and fans of the more inferior sports, too - for discussion, cameraderie, and even the occasional smack talk.

For example, Furman has nearly twice as many Southern Conference football championships as the next best SoCon member, and over three times as many as The Citadel....which is why they must carry our luggage

GoPaladins.com is not affiliated with Furman University or its athletics programs.