apaladin wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 10:57 pm
The rule for revenue sharing teams is a roster and scholarship limit of 105.
Don’t think there is a scholarship limit as that term has become, essentially, meaningless in the days of NIL.
FUBeAR imagines the upshot of that is Title XI Compliance… “Yes Ma’am, Mrs. Investigator. We are giving 0 Football or Men’s Basketball Scholarships. So, even though we just dropped 6 Women’s Sports, we are in full NCAA / Title IX Compliance. NIL payouts for those 2 Sports? Let’s see. 105 Rostered Football Players and 15 Rostered Men’s Hoopsters. So, $120 million, of course. But that’s all verifiably market-driven. Who wouldn’t want our 4th Team Offensive Guard making a Social Media post about their Car Dealership at $1 million a pop? His follower numbers are INSANE! We did get one of our Women’s Rowing Team a $100 QuickLube Grand Opening appearance spot…before we dropped Women’s Rowing.”
The other thing about opting in to the Profit-Share model is that NIL can be run in-house. So, schools opting in will have control of that revenue stream to the Players. Shouldn’t be able to be ‘held hostage’ quite as easily - as the Head of Hawaii’s NIL Collective was trying to/threatening to do cuz he didn’t like a personnel decision the school made. Not sure what will happen to collectives in the Profit-Sharing model. It would seem they would have outlived their purpose in that model…but they have ‘war chests’ so we’ll see.
BTW - heard from a (usually) knowledgable person that the SoCon is going to opt-in…which is interesting as FUBeAR doesn’t think any SoCon Athletics Dept’s have any profits to share.