lawdog wrote: ↑Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:59 pm
Discussing Weinstein and Jerry Richardson in the same vein makes no sense. One has been accused, beyond doubt,openly, routinely, and often, for decades, of rape and graphic harassment. Jerry Richardson, in his eighties and a heart transplant recipient, has recently, vaguely, and anonymously been accused essentially of boorish remarks, likely by someone who settled and waived all such claims; every business or other entity of any size settles such claims each year. Jerry Richardson has done more for North and South Carolina than any other individual of his era, in terms of employment , morale, and reputation of the region. He is a gentleman of the highest order but, like the rest of us, not perfect.
No disagreement from me, but I don’t think Team #MeToo sees it that way.
If the NFL felt the right thing to do would be to force him to sell his Team, thus disassociating him (and his family) from their organization, because of vague, anonymous accusations of “boorish remarks, likely by someone who settled and waived all such claims,” why would Wofford be exempt from following (or being relentlessly pressured to follow) the same course of action?
By the way, when I Googled - University rejects donation - that is the 1st article that popped up. There are other examples of schools taking similar courses of action with less notorious alleged perpetrators than Weinstein, including our current US President (well, I guess some don’t see him as any less notorious, but I think the point is made). Surely, you don’t need me to provide a list of all of the rich & powerful men whose former organizations have disassociated themselves from them in the past year based only on (often) vague accusations of “inappropriate behavior.”
Perhaps Donald Sterling & UCLA is a more apt example -
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/ucla- ... rling-gift - that I should have cited. I just didn’t feel like taking the time to scroll down. Also, right here in the SoCon, our own SamfordU, just last year, rejected $3mm from the Alabama Baptists because of objections from the LGBTQ+ community. Different social issues; similar courses of action.
With the NFL’s STRONG response to the accusations, however negligible they may be, I just don’t see how Wofford will be able to avoid taking a similar stance without incurring a #MeToo / SJW Firestorm. That’s the world we live in today. Perhaps not in SparkleCity just yet.
We’ll see, I guess.
On a side note, I heard Condoleeza Rice had the nameplate on her locker in the LADIES MEMBER’S Locker Room polished up before she teed off this morning at Augusta National.
See how that works...