I don't think anyone made these decisions. The current landscape in University athletics certainly is not what the NCAA wants, Universities want, fans want, or what coaches want but when all these parties can't come to an agreement about what they want, especially with certain options being off the table due to legal constraints, we get this...Bootie wrote:So my next question in this topic is: who are the fools that are responsible for creating this fiasco, and how do we keep them from making any future decisions about what they think is good for college sports?
I can't come up with a way that is more fair to student athletes. If you play well you get to move to a higher profile University, make more money, get better coaching, facilities, and exposure. If you don't you make less money, less exposure, and will be possibly shoved out your respective athletic program.
But that's the thing. Does anyone have a better idea on how to make things more fair for student athletes given the legal constraints and meeting the demands of all of the stake holders?
There are many things I don't like about the current landscape of college athletics but I think this was a long time coming. I don't like student athletes reshuffling to see the best deal they can get every year but coaches already did that. I don't like the de-emphases on academics as it not only devalues the degrees that student athletes receive but also the degrees that non-student athletes receive. However, student athletes were already often picking the easiest majors, being told they couldn't pick certain majors, not showing up to classes, not getting the same internship, research, and educational opportunities as non-student athletes due to time constraints, etc. so maybe that ship had already sailed as well...