The Jackal wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2024 6:49 amgofurman wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 9:45 pmJackal, I like you,... you bring A LOT to this board. But you really really backstep.. A LOT.The Jackal wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 9:58 amI guess I'm just not as worried as the rest of you about the "state" of the program. We lost a ton of players off last years team. I do not believe anyone thought we were going to blow out Charleston Southern. They nearly beat us the last time we played them, too.
My guess is the coaches have decided to roll with Hedden. Jones has been given opportunities, and perhaps has not separated himself.
My experience has been that if you play a freshman QB, you are going to have games like this. Some days they will look fantastic. Other days they will look rough. The biggest gap, sometimes, is realizing that ball security is important and they simply cannot make every play against college defenses like they were able to against high school defenses.
Go back and look at the box scores when Darren Grainger was a freshman. It was a roller coaster every week.
From my observations, we made a ton of mistakes yesterday and still could have and probably should have won the game.
- too many turnovers.
- dropped passes
- giving up points before the half
- fumbles
- penalties on scoring plays
- getting a delay of game in a two minute offense coming out of a time out cannot happen.
All of that has got to get cleaned up. We're in for a long season if we play like that.
In my view, we'll get right some against Stetson, who is not very good. We'll have an opportunity to get this taste out of our mouths against William & Mary. Then we'll have nothing but SoCon games. I'd rather look like crap against Charleston Southern in week 2 than turn the ball over four times against a SoCon opponent.
Our goals are still in front of us, but gotta do better than we did yesterday.
Several times over the years you have been called on this. Preseason you will say things like (paraphrase here) "our culture is great under CCH so we will be fine".. or "sure the starters left but the guys who are ready are very talented and have a lot of Snaps - if not starts - and a lot of good game experience". In other words, you imply we are fine. Then we lose and you say "I do not believe anyone thought we were going to blow out Charleston Southern." - which is WRONG. Vegas had half the money on Furman -20 and half on CSU Plus 20. Money talks. And money said we WERE going to blow them out ... also last time we played them in Gville we won by THIRTY THREE. In Charleston we escaped, you are right ... but in Gville we KILLED these guys
I have never, and will never, much care what Vegas thinks. "It" was wrong. If you want to make your opinions on Furman football based on Vegas, feel free. I don't.
Nothing that I am saying is inconsistent with what I have said in the past. The reality is that I have a different opinion about things than you do. You are entitled to take whatever view you want.
Last years' team - with all its stars and veterans - lost to arguably the worst team on the schedule. Bad games happen. What matters is what you do to fix the problem. I personally have a lot of faith in the coaching staff, and base that opinion over the past 7 years of evidence that they are good coaches and recruit quality players.
Jackal, This is just NOT TRUE. I agree with you CONSTANTLY - and even take the time to point it out... and somehow you don't see it? I am sure you do see it but maybe don't want to? and I really appreciate your explanations too ! Let me find a few examples. Constantly thank you for your explanations
---------------------------------- The real irony here is both of these examples are IN THIS THREAD JUST BACK ONE PAGE ! ---
HERE POST 90298:
Jackal, I totally Agree. I brought this up a week ago. I mentioned this Prior to CSU. That I thought CSU had a better schedule because we couldn't work on things at 70+ - 0. You can't work on SPEED etc. If we play South Carolina or whomever.. maybe we lost 45-14 but there are items to WORK ON. Like last year. At 76-0 I don't know that we learn or can improve. It's like playing an NFL team. You can tell our guy to block a little differently but when the swim move puts us on our butt what do we really learn?The Jackal wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:40 amI sort of feel like Ole Miss beat us twice.
All the mistakes we would have made against a competitive opponent in Week 1 we made in Week 2.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------POST 90300 - again, IN THIS VERY THREAD back just one page ------------------
Jackal, completely agree here. Our D is good with a backfield weakness for sure... but decent. Still too early to know as CSU isn't exactly a killer on OL.The Jackal wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 5:02 pmI think we are going to need to assume our secondary is going to struggle at times, but our offense should pick up some slack.
Defense has some lapses but played well enough to win. We can’t cough the ball up over and over on offense and expect to keep things right.
The OFFENSE HAS TO IMPROVE or we are in for a long year.