• FURMAN AT OLE MISS-WE HAVE A CHANCE

 #89937  by Roundball
 Sun Sep 01, 2024 4:54 am
apaladin wrote:
Sat Aug 31, 2024 9:51 pm
Worst beatdown since losing to Davidson 77-0 in 1969 when we were the football for fun bunch and gave no svholarships and were still just D1, no fcs. The biggest concerns we had with this team was the OL and secondary. Even considerng who we played I see no signs of encouragement from these two groups.
We might as well quit the rest of the season. Seriously, this game means nothing. I have complete faith in this coaching staff and players. We will have a good season, and be in the playoffs.
 #89938  by gofurman
 Sun Sep 01, 2024 5:01 am
The Jackal wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2024 12:54 am
Not the result we wanted or hoped for. I was not going to be surprised with a lopsided game, though I expected it to be less lopsided.

Just a few take aways for me:

1. This was our least important game on the schedule. It was effectively a scrimmage - both teams played a lot of guys and the score did not really much matter. The remaining 11 games are far more important to us.

2. I'm tired of talking about the losses from last year. They are gone. We have the team we have. Move on.

3. I thought physically we looked good. We compared well size-wise in most spots. Their offensive line is massive and we are not likely to see that sort of unit again this season (maybe ever).

4. Hard to take much away from the game, offensively. We were out matched. We had a few nearly 40 yard pass plays, which we didn't see a ton of last year. We saw a lot of different running backs, all of whom appeared to have a good bit of elusiveness.

5. The secondary got beat a lot, but we knew that was likely to happen some tonight. The positive for the "inexperience" people is that now our DBs have a lot more of it.

That's an incredibly difficult offense to defense. They stress you vertically and horizontally. We couldn't really take away anything they wanted to do. Again, we aren't going to see a QB in Jaxon Dart's zip-code this season or receivers like this group.

6. The score was bad, but I'm also surprised that Ole Miss never really took their foot off the gas until late in the game. They went for several fourth downs, they threw deep balls the whole game, etc. We had a few missed tackles on up the middle runs, but I know we'll get that cleaned up.
This. Too much lopsided. A few thoughts. One. Lane Kiffin is an AZZZ. went for it on fourth and two up 14-0 early. Really Lane? Dumb and rude. Rude is obvious. Swinney etc don’t do that. The dumb part is you are showing your special plays vs a team (Furman) that you don’t need to. Plus don’t you want to practice FGs also? But mainly why show your 4th and 3 play vs FCS

That’s rude ,not cool and not smart. Karma is a female dog man. I wish the good fan who posted here well but now have to pull against Ole Miss the rest of the way.

I do wish we could have stopped them some. Like 55-7 or so. And that leads me to -

Hope the team can rebound. Occasionally one loss becomes two if particularly painful (close in OT) or ..bad like this lopsided one. Need to rally and regroup. Which can be tough because you don’t want to say “well let’s let it go because hey.. we knew we couldn’t compete this week”. Shouldn’t ever admit that or think that.

I don’t agree with burn the tape and move on. Use this to get PISSED OFF. Coach K once famously was told after huge loss to UVA “ here’s to forgetting tonight”. He replied “here’s to NEVER forgetting tonight
 #89949  by The Jackal
 Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:12 am
gofurman wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2024 5:01 am
The Jackal wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2024 12:54 am
Not the result we wanted or hoped for. I was not going to be surprised with a lopsided game, though I expected it to be less lopsided.

Just a few take aways for me:

1. This was our least important game on the schedule. It was effectively a scrimmage - both teams played a lot of guys and the score did not really much matter. The remaining 11 games are far more important to us.

2. I'm tired of talking about the losses from last year. They are gone. We have the team we have. Move on.

3. I thought physically we looked good. We compared well size-wise in most spots. Their offensive line is massive and we are not likely to see that sort of unit again this season (maybe ever).

4. Hard to take much away from the game, offensively. We were out matched. We had a few nearly 40 yard pass plays, which we didn't see a ton of last year. We saw a lot of different running backs, all of whom appeared to have a good bit of elusiveness.

5. The secondary got beat a lot, but we knew that was likely to happen some tonight. The positive for the "inexperience" people is that now our DBs have a lot more of it.

That's an incredibly difficult offense to defense. They stress you vertically and horizontally. We couldn't really take away anything they wanted to do. Again, we aren't going to see a QB in Jaxon Dart's zip-code this season or receivers like this group.

6. The score was bad, but I'm also surprised that Ole Miss never really took their foot off the gas until late in the game. They went for several fourth downs, they threw deep balls the whole game, etc. We had a few missed tackles on up the middle runs, but I know we'll get that cleaned up.
This. Too much lopsided. A few thoughts. One. Lane Kiffin is an AZZZ. went for it on fourth and two up 14-0 early. Really Lane? Dumb and rude. Rude is obvious. Swinney etc don’t do that. The dumb part is you are showing your special plays vs a team (Furman) that you don’t need to. Plus don’t you want to practice FGs also? But mainly why show your 4th and 3 play vs FCS

That’s rude ,not cool and not smart. Karma is a female dog man. I wish the good fan who posted here well but now have to pull against Ole Miss the rest of the way.

I do wish we could have stopped them some. Like 55-7 or so. And that leads me to -

Hope the team can rebound. Occasionally one loss becomes two if particularly painful (close in OT) or ..bad like this lopsided one. Need to rally and regroup. Which can be tough because you don’t want to say “well let’s let it go because hey.. we knew we couldn’t compete this week”. Shouldn’t ever admit that or think that.

I don’t agree with burn the tape and move on. Use this to get PISSED OFF. Coach K once famously was told after huge loss to UVA “ here’s to forgetting tonight”. He replied “here’s to NEVER forgetting tonight
Some of that is on us, too.

There were at least two plays where Ole Miss ran the ball up the middle for a touchdown and we just didn't make the tackle.
 #89950  by Furmanoid
 Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:23 am
tim wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:02 am
I have a new team to hate now. In the past, I have been ambivalent about Ole Miss
So they should have taken it easy on us and just held the door for ND to pass them in the rankings? Gotta remember that they absolutely want to go to the playoffs with a good draw. This is how it’s done. You have to STOMP patsies. Look at the other scores at Alabama, UT etc.

If we insist on playing the 25 or so pro teams that are still going to seriously compete for playoffs, this is what they have to do to us. It’s all business now.
Davemeister, Affirm liked this
 #89951  by Affirm
 Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:26 am
apaladin wrote:
Sat Aug 31, 2024 9:51 pm
Worst beatdown since losing to Davidson 77-0 in 1969 when we were the football for fun bunch and gave no svholarships and were still just D1, no fcs. The biggest concerns we had with this team was the OL and secondary. Even considerng who we played I see no signs of encouragement from these two groups.
That 1969 Davidson game was
Furman 14 - Davidson 77.
It was a home game for Furman.
(That was the year Davidson played in the Tangerine Bowl in Orlando. Unfortunately for Davidson, they ended up 7-4 including losing 4 of their last 6 games including that bowl game against Toledo.)
I believe Furman’s worst loss ever was in 1918 when we went to Georgia Tech and lost 0-118.
Good news, though: 7 days later, we played at home and beat Erskine 60-0.
I believe our second-worst loss was our home game against Clemson in 1915: 0-99.
So it appears that the loss at Ole Miss was our third-worst loss ever, and our worst loss since 106 years ago. (And I am highly doubtful we will beat Charleston Southern 60-0, like the score against Erskine 106 years ago (and I am not at all sure we will beat CSU; it’s questionable).
apaladin liked this
 #89953  by The Jackal
 Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:48 am
Furmanoid wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:23 am
tim wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:02 am
I have a new team to hate now. In the past, I have been ambivalent about Ole Miss
So they should have taken it easy on us and just held the door for ND to pass them in the rankings? Gotta remember that they absolutely want to go to the playoffs with a good draw. This is how it’s done. You have to STOMP patsies. Look at the other scores at Alabama, UT etc.

If we insist on playing the 25 or so pro teams that are still going to seriously compete for playoffs, this is what they have to do to us. It’s all business now.

Yes. They have complementary goals of making their wins look sexy and making their QB a heisman trophy favorite.

It'll be interesting to watch them the next few weeks, too. Ole Miss next plays MTSU, who struggled to beat Tennessee Tech at home yesterday. They also get Georgia Southern, who just gave up 56 points at home to Boise State.

My guess is that after four weeks, there will be a little section of the bar reserved for a few of the lower-tier teams that have been sacrificed at the altar of Ole Miss's quest for a title.

Alabama beat Western Kentucky 63-0 yesterday. Mercer still has to go there, but late in the season. I suspect that won't be pretty either.
 #89954  by The Jackal
 Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:50 am
Affirm wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:26 am
apaladin wrote:
Sat Aug 31, 2024 9:51 pm
Worst beatdown since losing to Davidson 77-0 in 1969 when we were the football for fun bunch and gave no svholarships and were still just D1, no fcs. The biggest concerns we had with this team was the OL and secondary. Even considerng who we played I see no signs of encouragement from these two groups.
That 1969 Davidson game was
Furman 14 - Davidson 77.
It was a home game for Furman.
(That was the year Davidson played in the Tangerine Bowl in Orlando. Unfortunately for Davidson, they ended up 7-4 including losing 4 of their last 6 games including that bowl game against Toledo.)
I believe Furman’s worst loss ever was in 1918 when we went to Georgia Tech and lost 0-118.
Good news, though: 7 days later, we played at home and beat Erskine 60-0.
I believe our second-worst loss was our home game against Clemson in 1915: 0-99.
So it appears that the loss at Ole Miss was our third-worst loss ever, and our worst loss since 106 years ago. (And I am highly doubtful we will beat Charleston Southern 60-0, like the score against Erskine 106 years ago (and I am not at all sure we will beat CSU; it’s questionable).
Last season Portland State lost to Oregon 81-7, and then two weeks later beat North American 91-0.
 #89956  by HB88
 Sun Sep 01, 2024 9:36 am
“But why does this matter? Why is it noteworthy that the Rebels (1-0) pummeled a group of FCS players in the Paladins (0-1) that,by Kiffin's own admission, put up less of a fight than Ole Miss' own scout team in a mock game last week. In a game bereft of takeaways due to the level of the competition across the line of scrimmage], it's a window into what Kiffin has built.” Taken from Clarion Ledger article. This is hard to read. It’s not that I expected a close game, but I’m not sure what to make of what actually happened. Is it possible that our coaching anticipated as much and simply tried to survive?
 #89957  by The Jackal
 Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:02 am
Hard to know. Ole Miss lost two games last year to Bama and UGA. Saban has been on record saying that last season they had the skill players as good as any team in the country. They went out and essentially purchased an offensive line and defensive front seven to play with the two teams that beat them.

It was a no win situation for Furman. We couldn't run it. We didn't have enough time to throw it. Defensively they were still chunking the ball 50 yards up 50 points. We never once looked like we were ever trying to win the game.

Now, we still played poorly. We lost guys in coverage. We dropped passes. We missed blocks and tackles.

At the same time, I think it's time for our administration to realize this is not the 80s and 90s and we cannot compete with these SEC programs. Heck, CLEMSON can't compete with them, much less Furman.

I have a lot of faith in our coaching staff. I have faith in our players. Yesterday, it seemed like the game plan was just to get out of there intact.
Choir Boy, gman84, dornb liked this
 #89962  by gman84
 Sun Sep 01, 2024 11:46 am
Paul C said earlier that these games may not be worth playing anymore. Something to chew on. College football is not what it was 12 months ago. This isn’t 85 scollies compared to 63 schollies. This has become the minor league NFL vs FCS. I agree we looked like we were just going through the motions. The landscape of college ball was totally different when this game was scheduled. I said before this game that our season will not be defined by this game. How we respond will define our season.
dornb, Choir Boy liked this
 #89963  by cavedweller2
 Sun Sep 01, 2024 11:59 am
College Athletes vs paid mercenaries
dornb, Choir Boy liked this
 #89964  by apaladin
 Sun Sep 01, 2024 12:01 pm
gman84 wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2024 11:46 am
Paul C said earlier that these games may not be worth playing anymore. Something to chew on. College football is not what it was 12 months ago. This isn’t 85 scollies compared to 63 schollies. This has become the minor league NFL vs FCS. I agree we looked like we were just going through the motions. The landscape of college ball was totally different when this game was scheduled. I said before this game that our season will not be defined by this game. How we respond will define our season.
Correct. Yet even though we were completely overmatched FCS Idaho lost to #3 Oregon 24-14, it was 17-14 with less than 6 to go. WCU led #24 NCS entering the 4th. Last night was not normal as Furman was a completely new inexperienced team playing one of the best teams with one of the highest payrolls. Not the norm.
dornb liked this
 #89965  by The Jackal
 Sun Sep 01, 2024 12:35 pm
apaladin wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2024 12:01 pm
gman84 wrote:
Sun Sep 01, 2024 11:46 am
Paul C said earlier that these games may not be worth playing anymore. Something to chew on. College football is not what it was 12 months ago. This isn’t 85 scollies compared to 63 schollies. This has become the minor league NFL vs FCS. I agree we looked like we were just going through the motions. The landscape of college ball was totally different when this game was scheduled. I said before this game that our season will not be defined by this game. How we respond will define our season.
Correct. Yet even though we were completely overmatched FCS Idaho lost to #3 Oregon 24-14, it was 17-14 with less than 6 to go. WCU led #24 NCS entering the 4th. Last night was not normal as Furman was a completely new inexperienced team playing one of the best teams with one of the highest payrolls. Not the norm.
I cannot explain the Oregon/Idaho score.

If you look at the box, Oregon thoroughly dominated every aspect of that game but the scoreboard. They had three times as many first downs, 250 more yards of offense, and nearly 20 minutes more possession.

Idaho statically had a better game than Furman, but not drastically so. Idaho had slightly better rushing and passing numbers, but lower completion percentage than Furman, 10 minutes less possession, more turnovers, and was sacked more times.

I think we just ran into a buzzsaw.
  • 1
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 15

Recent Topics

User avatar DO these players have eligibility?

by sluggo

Thu Nov 21, 2024 4:53 pm

Default Avatar Mercer

by The Jackal

Thu Nov 21, 2024 4:49 pm

Default Avatar Samford Game Officially Cancelled

by The Jackal

Thu Nov 21, 2024 4:30 pm

User avatar @ Charleston Southern (Nov. 23rd)

by FU Hoopla

Thu Nov 21, 2024 4:14 pm

User avatar Notes from all around

by FurmanATT

Thu Nov 21, 2024 4:07 pm

Twitter

About Us

GoPaladins.com is the latest iteration of The Unofficial Furman Football Page. Launched in August of 1996, The UFFP welcomes fans of all FCS football teams - and fans of the more inferior sports, too - for discussion, cameraderie, and even the occasional smack talk.

For example, Furman has nearly twice as many Southern Conference football championships as the next best SoCon member, and over three times as many as The Citadel....which is why they must carry our luggage

GoPaladins.com is not affiliated with Furman University or its athletics programs.