AstroDin wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 7:56 am
^^^ Boy Howdy — the Citadel misses a lot of tackle opportunities! Reid is undoubtedly an excellent back, but the Dog's defense made him
look like the next Barry Sanders.
Also, does that first CItadel drive expose the WCU defense to a physical running game with actual edge speed? Furman will be a different kind of animal for WCU to match up with. It's going to be an exciting matchup.
WCU - Rushing
Player_______Att._Gain_Loss Net TD Lg. Avg.
Reid,Desmond 27 174 4 170 1 19 6.3 - vs Samford
Reid,Desmond 29 177 0 177 1 33 6.1 - @ EKU
Reid,Desmond 13 112 1 111 2 25 8.5 - vs CSU
Reid,Desmond 18 167 0 167 5 23 9.3 - @ CIT
Reid, Desmond 87_630_5_625_9_33_
7.2 - Total vs. Non-SEC Teams
Oklahoma State - Rushing
Player Year Att Yds Avg TD
Sanders, Barry 1986 74 325 4.4 2
Sanders, Barry1987 105 603 5.7 9 4
Sanders, Barry 1988 344 2628 7.6 37
Sanders, Barry Career 523 3556
6.8 48
Welp…if the Nike fits…
He’s really, really, really good…but you aren’t wrong about the bellhops’ ineptitude. And it wasn’t only Reid. The WCU OL - to Jackal’s point - was just MASHING the poor undersized bellhop D-Front.
And…FUBeAR likes your pickup on the Cantamount D. They seemed to be more focused on showing the bellhops how tough they were AFTER the whistle rather than doing their job(s) in contain or in coverage during the plays. CIT’s very young Team did look a bit intimidated. Unlike a game we played @ Elon quite a few years ago, FUBeAR doesn’t think the grown men on FU’s Team will be at all intimidated by these lavender-clad young bucks’ post-play antics. FUBeAR expects the Paladin Men will find them humorous…kinda cute, really.