youwouldno wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 5:44 pm
paladinfan12 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 4:35 pm
For as long as Clemson has hung on to Brownell, I would think that would be a very desirable job. You can be very mediocre and not be fired.
And as far as Richey goes - At some point an opportunity will arise for CBR where Furman can't compete with the money and opportunity that a large school is going to offer. Glad Furman locked him up now. Best case is he stays for a long time. Worst case we pocket a buyout.
There's no chance Richey's contract includes a meaningful buyout provision.
Clemson hired Brownell after 3 seasons at Wright State and zero NCAA appearances. No one wanted the job even after Purnell had them solidly on the fringes of the top 25. Also the ACC was relatively stronger back then. And Purnell left for one of the weakest programs in any of the power conferences.
The reason is apparently difficult for some to grasp - it might just be hard to conceptualize once your IQ drops below a certain point. But the basic idea is that any credible candidate for the Clemson job either already has or soon will have better options.
There is a buyout in Richey's contract. South Carolina paid a $450,000 buyout to Chattanooga for Lamont Paris. CSU paid Drake $425,000 for Niko Medved, and Alabama paid $750K to Buffalo when it hired Nate Oats. Nearly every coach who receives a multi-year contract in America has one. We'll never know, but I am sure that Richey has a substantial one, especially if he leaves in the next 1-2 years.
Say what you want about the Clemson job, but Brownell makes nearly $3 million a year until 2026. Clemson recently renovated Littlejohn, has a substantial donor base, and plays in a top 5 conference that routinely sends 6-9 teams to the tournament. It certainly isn't the best job around, but I can think of several competent coaches who would jump at the chance to make $3 million per year if that job opened up. Only problem is - they have remained dumbfoundedly loyal to Brownell for 13 years.