Is it clear from ETSU games so far whether Quarles installed the same/similar offense as he called at Furman?
I went back and watched a good bit of their game with the Citadel and my answer is "mostly yes."youwouldno wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 12:08 pmIs it clear from ETSU games so far whether Quarles installed the same/similar offense as he called at Furman?
The look is mostly a single back offense. Some pistol. A lot of shotgun.
The bell cow is definitely Saylors. It's actually hard to find instances when he comes off the field. Either he's the single back or he's flexed out at receiver.
The obvious comp is Devin Wynn. Quarles uses Saylors like he used Wynn - feature back or split out at receiver.
Unlike his time at Furman, Quarles rarely seems to substitute Saylors. Saylors was credited with 24 of ETSU's 27 rushing attempts. I believe only one other running back even had a carry. He's their guy.
Instead of the second running back frequently in the H-Back role (think Devin Abrams in last year's offense), ETSU looks to use a lot of two TE sets. Their primary TE (40) is more of an H-Back type. The second TE (84) is more of a traditional blocking fullback called a TE.
Unlike at Furman, the TEs aren't featured much in the passing game. Only one TE had a reception Saturday. 84 is mostly a run blocker. 40 runs more routes, but appears to be a guy someone has to cover but they aren't really statistically likely to throw to him.
The two primary receivers both appear to be long speedsters. They can stretch the field and Citadel was giving them a good bit of cushion.
The QB isn't much of a threat to run. In two games he has 7 attempts for -33 yards (mostly sacks, I would assume). His calling card is accuracy, though. Not a huge arm, but he gets the ball out quick and usually on target.
So, yes, based on that one game the ETSU offense appears similar to what he ran at Furman but with modifications to meet the Bucs' personnel.