Good grief. How soon we forget.Flagman wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 9:09 amKeep preaching, Bear.FUBeAR wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 1:03 amAnother inaccurate premise when applied to the outcome of a single game. Even great Coaches do not always get their Players to execute well. Sure, St. Vincent won 105 games, but 41 of the games he Coached did not end up in the Win column. I doubt he had better Players that failed to execute properly in each of those 41 games. Coach Saban’s Teams have failed to win 66 games he Coached. Sometimes Players fail to execute because they are 18-22 years old and allow themselves to become distracted between the last walk-thru on Friday & kickoff on Saturday. Nope - the 3 completely intertwined primary components of winning a Football game are always intertwined; 1 cannot be separated & dismissed claiming it’s ’covered’ by 1 or both of the other 2.gofurman wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 10:31 pmFUBeAR. I don’t disagree however I would say that execution and coaching are intertwined. (As you noted). So that puts us back at talent and coaching. Good coaches get their players to execute well. Yes there is some luck/officiating and one game does not a pattern make .. however two games would be the hint of a pattern. Anyway I suspect Furman wins if we can find any semblance of offense.FUBeAR wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 8:59 pmNope - 3 primary components - Athletic Talent, Execution, and Coaching - that are all actually intertwined/ interrelated. If you want to get technical - Officiating and, hate to say it, Luck (that spheroid is still oblong…yes?), are 2 other components which can determine the outcome of a single Football game.
Also, even if your proposition was sufficiently accurate, one would have to accept your premise that Furman has more talent than Mercer in order to arrive at the conclusion you are suggesting … IF Mercer happens to win this single Football game.
Head Coaches have multi-year contracts for good reason. Barring a complete meltdown of a program, the body of work over those years determines the quality of the Head Coach & his/her suitability for leading that program at that time.
FUBeAR, wholeheartedly, rejects your conclusion that IF Mercer beats Furman on Saturday, that proves (thus we must “concede”) that the Furman Coaching Staff was/is getting/has been getting out-coached. IF it happens, it will only prove 1 thing (assuming Officiating & Luck is ‘a wash’); that Mercer was a better Football Team than Furman on that day via some intertwined combination of Athletic Talent, Execution, and Coaching.
Your premise is utterly subjective and your conclusion is ludicrous.
I AM THE PREACHER OF LONG TERM. Not bear. For years I preached how I would rather lose one game to X FBS school by 1 point - say 30 to 29 - because of statiStical oddities (7 fumbles that ALL were recovered by the other team?). Because that would point to a great year overall. How soon we forget.
I SHOUTED that for years. EFFING YEARS.
Would far rather lose to Gamecocks (name your FBS team ) with -7 turnovers (weird turnovers we can correct easily) and lose by one point than win with a game they hike over the punters head 7 times. That latter case won’t hold up. The former? We’ve got a team!!!
Maybe I shouldn’t have said the one game /two game Mercer v FU thing but damn y’all have short memories. I yelled for years about being willing to lose if it showed a better team. I am way more about the long term than 99% of people here. I wish we coulda lost to NC State by one point with us having fumbled 7 times. Having dominated NC State on los. I would love it. Now later in FCS - esp playoffs - you have to WIN but a team that dominates NC State on LOS will be just fine. More than fine, Great actually.
Sorry but that was my special rant for years (like INJURIS and the sort) and anyone who has forgotten that needs to do more Brain games/crossword puzzles. FUBeAR don’t you be taking my thing. Lol.
These days I’ll keep injuris and maybe a guess the score. Think I’ll start one now..