I think Furman has made up a lot of ground in recruiting.
I believe that for much of the 2000s/2010s, administration and coaches operated like Furman would just maintain its position near the top of the FCS hierarchy by doing the same thing it always had. The "it worked before, it will work now" type of mentality.
What we saw was Furman's facilities lagging behind other smaller or newer programs. There wasn't the investment in maintaining its edge. We appeared woefully unprepared for the shift in college football over the last 10 or 15 years.
I think we have remedied a lot of those problems. Money is being spent in the right places. Real attention is being given to getting Furman back where it needs to be. It is a cautionary tale. A few years of not minding the store or resting on your laurels and you start looking up at Gardner Webb, Wofford, and Elon.
I believe that for much of the 2000s/2010s, administration and coaches operated like Furman would just maintain its position near the top of the FCS hierarchy by doing the same thing it always had. The "it worked before, it will work now" type of mentality.
What we saw was Furman's facilities lagging behind other smaller or newer programs. There wasn't the investment in maintaining its edge. We appeared woefully unprepared for the shift in college football over the last 10 or 15 years.
I think we have remedied a lot of those problems. Money is being spent in the right places. Real attention is being given to getting Furman back where it needs to be. It is a cautionary tale. A few years of not minding the store or resting on your laurels and you start looking up at Gardner Webb, Wofford, and Elon.
DeepPurple, dornb liked this