I wouldn't take Davidson and 25 points.
apaladin liked this
The Jackal wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 9:09 pmpurplehorse wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 8:24 pmMonmouth, Davidson, Holy Cross and Davidson IN
Furman OUT
I never could have imagined that happening in my lifetime. It may say something about parity and COVID-19 but it also tells us something about Furman football.
Monmouth, Davidson, and Holy Cross have nothing to do with Furman or parity in the FCS. Those teams were awarded the automatic bids from their conference. Furman has nothing to do with it.
apaladin wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 11:29 amRemember it wasn’t that long ago that teams like Davidson, Dayton, Butler etc were D3 in football and D1 in everything else until the brilliant move by the NCAA said if you are D1 you have to play D1 football. Why? You don’t have to do anythung different but you have to be called D1. So all these D3 teams just got reclassified to D1 in name only and got the FCS label. It wasn’t that bad at first because they didn’t participate in the playoffs unless they got an atlarge which never happened. Then when the playoffs expanded and the brilliant NCAA started handing out auto bids to the non-schollie leagues which 95% of the time just wastes bids.
A. Those caliber of teams????????purplehorse wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 1:33 amThe Jackal wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 9:09 pmpurplehorse wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 8:24 pmMonmouth, Davidson, Holy Cross and Davidson IN
Furman OUT
I never could have imagined that happening in my lifetime. It may say something about parity and COVID-19 but it also tells us something about Furman football.
Monmouth, Davidson, and Holy Cross have nothing to do with Furman or parity in the FCS. Those teams were awarded the automatic bids from their conference. Furman has nothing to do with it.
Got it! The point is it is embarrassing to have those caliber or teams in the playoffs when Furman is sitting at home. The nobody’s of the world have now moved up to the FCS and the mighty Paladins of the past are sitting at home.
PFL Playoff appearancesapaladin wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 11:29 amRemember it wasn’t that long ago that teams like Davidson, Dayton, Butler etc were D3 in football and D1 in everything else until the brilliant move by the NCAA said if you are D1 you have to play D1 football. Why? You don’t have to do anythung different but you have to be called D1. So all these D3 teams just got reclassified to D1 in name only and got the FCS label. It wasn’t that bad at first because they didn’t participate in the playoffs unless they got an atlarge which never happened. Then when the playoffs expanded and the brilliant NCAA started handing out auto bids to the non-schollie leagues which 95% of the time just wastes bids.
Yep - missed those.apaladin wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 3:25 pmFUBear, the PFL is actually 2-7. You left out 2013 Tennessee St. 31 Butler 0 and 2015 W. Illinois 24 Dayton 7. San Diego has dominated the league and has both wins and 5 of the 7 bids including the last 4 until this year. They had won 39 straight in the PFL until March 27th. Its been a one team league. Agree with Furmanoid, very doubtful that SD is true non scholly. .
Well, generally really good players are offered scholarships. Most parents would pretty much insist their kid take the scholarship to Wofford or Furman rather than have to fork out $70k for Davidson or even a mere $40k for PC. So everybody else’ guys should be way, way better than PFL guys. So you would expect their playoff games to always be blowout losses.
As you admit, that is a generalization. I would say there would be many exceptions. And most parents would not necessarily insist anything if the kid can go to a really, really good school, get a really, really good education, and have a good time enjoying playing football. And I would say everybody else's players being way, way better would be an exaggeration. Also, maybe most playoff games would be losses, but not necessarily blowout losses. Keep in mind that Furman has suffered a number of blowout losses or at least a large number of disappointing losses in playoffs. Having scholarships does not necessarily prevent that. Most of the players being on some type of scholarship - that's fine. Bring in good students, good citizens, who can play and maybe want to play football. Perhaps my main argument is that ROI on football, scholarship football even at the FCS level, is possibly too low to be sustainable by a school as small as Furman. Other basically all the other scholarship sports are more sustainable because they involve fewer scholarship that can be balanced in regard to Title IX, either with a women's team in the same sport (even baseball with softball). We can still have football. We can be satisfactorily competitive at our level. We can do it like Pioneer Football League does it. (Wofford ought to be smart enough to go along with us on such a move, but if they are not smart enough, I would be surprised but I would not really care, because I believe they would be wrong.)Furmanoid wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 6:43 pmWell, generally really good players are offered scholarships. Most parents would pretty much insist their kid take the scholarship to Wofford or Furman rather than have to fork out $70k for Davidson or even a mere $40k for PC. So everybody else’ guys should be way, way better than PFL guys. So you would expect their playoff games to always be blowout losses.
I’m suspecting that many of their good players are on some type of scholarship. They just pretend it isn’t an athletic scholarship.