Furmanoid wrote: ↑Mon Mar 08, 2021 11:43 am
affirm wrote: ↑Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:43 am
Furmanoid wrote: ↑Mon Mar 08, 2021 9:31 am
I imagine VMI will not only be beaten but blown out a couple of times. They are VMI. If you were a recruit and you had a choice between VMI and anywhere else in FCS, would you go to VMI? It’s the Citadel without Charleston, CofC girls or even one beach. If you had to choose between VMI and pretty good DII programs, would you choose VMI? Of course not. It is very difficult to see how they could have actually gotten good.
If we win out we will win the conference.
VMI is not a bad school.
I’m sure it’s a fine school, but I’m equally sure that a tiny percentage of HS athletes would want to go there given any other choice. Their brutal sports history is evidence of that. I know we want to believe that they’ve magically gotten good, but I just can’t buy it.
VMI is good.
They have a P5 / NFL Prospect @ QB. They know what they want to do & who they are on O. Herres is an outstanding WR and they have several others who are impressive as well. Their O-Line is adequate for what they do, and their RB’s fit that description also.
On D, while their history is being ridiculously unsound, they are now innovative & wily. They are not afraid to adjust their game plan to take away the other Teams’ O. Recognizing their talent is a bit limited, they don’t fall into the “We do what we do. We dictate to the Offense,” trap that you see so many DC’s fall into. They will adjust their personnel, their tactics, and their scheme to give them the best chance to stop the opposing O. Whether it’s the Triple Option or the AirRaid, they will adjust their personnel and tactics to give their players the best chance to be successful & the Team the best chance to win.
And, as always, they play HARD.
To beat them, your DB’s have to beat blocks and tackle to the ground on 1st contact. Your DB’s have to make plays on well-thrown, but risky balls thrown in their direction. Pressure on the QB is nice, but containment is more important - that applies to their running game also. They don’t want the QB to run & they really don’t want to run the ball - but they will do both of those things if not contained. Remember Samford with Devlin Hodges - pretty much the same deal here...although Hodges would throw bad balls on occasion. Udinski rarely, if ever, does. He’s not as mobile / shifty as Hodges, but he can run effectively, if required.
On O, you have to counter-punch. You have to quickly get into their DC’s head & figure out what he has cooked up to stop you - to expose your weaknesses & minimize theirs. Then you have to take what they are giving you - what they didn’t expect you to take. It may not be your best ‘thing,’ but they are willing to give it to you - take it! Their D is far better than Samford’s ever was.
So, right now, think about the best Samford Teams that were making the playoffs a few years back. VMI, today, is better than those Samford Teams.