Furmanoid wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:16 amCases (positives) are going down. The point is that if you maintain the current rate of testing you may never get below “new case” numbers that some find frightening. That’s because even a low false positive rate in a huge number of tests will generate a pseudo plateau that isn’t real. I just wonder where that plateau will be. Seems like something the experts would care about, but they don’t.The Jackal wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:49 amFurmanoid wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 8:25 amAt this rate of testing, I wonder how low the new case number can go. It may not be possible to get below 100 or so even if the virus is completely gone. Nobody knows. But since deaths and cases are slowing down the story has predictably shifted to side effects. The media and the experts should be able to generate a bigger panic than ever with that one.apaladin wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 2:14 amCases were down again by 300 in S.C. on Monday. Just over 700 cases, much lower than it has been. When this all started the premise was to not overload the health systems. That was accomplished. Now the obsession is cases and the vast majority of those are irrelevant but it now seems we have to eliminate the virus before things can return to normal. The new norm is no one can get sick from anything. Everyone has to be “safe“. Ridiculous. The world is not a “safe” place, never has been, never will be.
I'm not a statistician, but "case" is not equivalent to "test."
If tests are slowing down, you are moving in the wrong direction.
At bottom, I don't really trust what most of you think about the game of football, and certainly don't put much stock into your thoughts on viral epidemiology and statistics.
This is becoming 2020s version of "THROW THE BALL DOWNFIELD"
FU3 liked this