fufanatic wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:04 pm
apaladin wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2019 11:26 am
Thanks but I think I will pass on the SoCon bashing. Don't plan on going there for a while as I know FU is being ripped to shreads and there is no rebuttal possible.
In this particular thread it was more of a discussion by conference folks about the conference. All teams are getting trashed, not just Furman.
Yeah - only 1 woffy on there trying to cover his team’s poopy-diaper by saying FU’s diaper is much more poopier.
Not sure how that works when the anklebiters lost, at home, to an at-large Team that was only 1 game ahead of Charleston Southern (a Team FU curb-stomped) in their Conference standings and Furman lost, on the road, to an FCS Conference Champion.
Both diapers are plenty dirty & smelly...and that, along with the SoCon’s abysmal OOC record this year (and for the most part in prior recent years) & the SoCon’s failure to have any Team advance, significantly, in the Playoffs in recent years...has convinced FUBeAR to change his prior thinking and resolve that the SoCon is 9 toddlers with dirty diapers that need to decide, individually AND collectively, if they are happy playing NEC, Patriot League, & even Pioneer League level of FCS Football OR do they want to make the necessary changes (Courting/Adding Schools that ARE serious about FCS Football (JaxSt, KSU, APSU, et al), OOC FCS competitive scheduling requirements, etc.) & INVESTMENTS (Assistant Coach’s salary pools, Recruiting budgets, Full Cost of Attendance payments, work-around$ to any less than 63 unrestricted scholarship limitations, etc.) to play ‘big-boy’ FCS Football.
If no significant changes occur before the 2020 Season, we have our answer. Nothing at all wrong with the NEC, PL, or PFL. I believe those conferences and schools are doing what they want to do & are where they want to be. Didn’t think that’s what/where the SoCon and it’s Member Schools wanted to be...but maybe they/we do.