Yup, that pretty much sums it up. That's the way the game is played and Niko played it well. He made a solid contribution to Furman and Furman gave him a solid HC resume. All is fair. That's life in the wonderful world of mid major basketball with a very few exceptions. Get 3 or 4 years out of a good, young coach - lose him to a higher level of pay - bring on the next hotshot. The most important person in that scenario is the AD who has to choose "the next best coach in the universe". That taint easy. I expect to see Niko in the Big 10 one day. Shalom, young man.Fessor wrote: ↑Fri Mar 23, 2018 3:32 pmNew movie: "Day 2: Rise of the Apologists"
He left FU abruptly for a job that not even 12 months later he was looking to jump from. He wasn't attached enough to stay long enough to coach that class in what turned out to be their last game of the season.
More likely, he was at FU as long as he needed to be. As soon as he changed from an unproven HC commodity to a somewhat proven HC commodity, he was looking to parlay it into a move into the next HC salary bracket.
I don't think he owes FU anything. It was a mutually beneficial transaction. I think it was more the shock of the revelation that we're (well) below Drake on the salary totem pole.
I also get it from a career standpoint. I've left a job in less than a year to take an opportunity that gave a 50% raise in base salary, but I didn't recruit any 18-year-olds to join me at the first job. (BTW, Uncle Sam takes most of that raise.)
I get that these guys work for a long time to get a break and then they need to make hay before the sun sets. As long as he's honest during recruiting about his career aspirations, then it's probably acceptable. (However, I doubt that any current Drake recruits were told "I may not be here by the time you arrive on campus later this year". The AD hung him out to dry, not a show of appreciation).
Just don't play it as leaving for a special place. ("It's not you. It's me") Be honest.