• Numbers. Just the Numbers.

 #60580  by furpop16
 Sat Nov 19, 2022 12:43 pm
While licking my wounds I thought we might benefit by reviewing some cold hard facts. Averaging just the three(3) D-1 games we've played, these facts stand out:

1. Scoring Offense: 78. Figure 80 is a good goal, we're close. Not really a problem.
2. Scoring Defense: 76.3. Figure 70 is the goal, this is a REAL PROBLEM.
3. Field Goal %: 48.8. Figure 47 is a good goal, again we're doing just fine.
4. FG Defense %: 51.9. Figure 40 is the goal (last year we averaged 45) ... this is a HUGE PROBLEM.
5. 3-pt FG/Game: 10.3. Figure 10 is good (last year we averaged 12) ... we're improving with 8, 11, & 12 in each of the 3 past games. We're okay
6. 3-pt FG %: 37. Figure 37 is good (last year we averaged 38.5 ... again, we're okay.
7. Free-Throw %: 60.3. We should be over 75% (last year 75.1%). Another REAL PROBLEM.
8. Rebound Mgn: 4.7. Figure 8 is a goal. We did fine against Belmont & PS, but -14 yesterday. INCONSISTENT.
9. Assists/Game: 17.3 We look for 20, which we hit against Belmont, but only 16 against PS & OD. INCONSISTENT.
10. Turnovers/Gm: 11.7 We look for 10. We're doing better, here, with 16 against Belmont, only 8 against PS and 11 yesterday. We've generally improved since Belmont. Not a problem.

Gang, yes we miss Hunter and Garrison, but the numbers don't lie. It's not their offensive production we're missing, its Defense. Scoring Defense & especially FG% Defense. And what's really annoying is CBR has called-out defense as a goal this year. Watch for coaches to be drilling this into our guys' heads.

And Free-Throw %age. If either of the last two games had come down to free-throws I wouldn't have been optimistic. This is something controllable. Look for add'l emphasis on these basics going forward.

Yes, our offense relies on movement and 3pt shooting, but the numbers reveal this isn't our real problem. It's defense, pure and simple. Go 'Dins.
 #60590  by FU Hoopla
 Sat Nov 19, 2022 1:22 pm
Good stuff!
Our switching on defense has been awful, leaving way to many wide open shooters and backdoor scores, teams are shooting insane percentages against us, defense has got to be tightened up somehow..........
 #60623  by SidBreamScores
 Sat Nov 19, 2022 4:40 pm
furpop16 wrote:
Sat Nov 19, 2022 12:43 pm
While licking my wounds I thought we might benefit by reviewing some cold hard facts. Averaging just the three(3) D-1 games we've played, these facts stand out:

1. Scoring Offense: 78. Figure 80 is a good goal, we're close. Not really a problem.
2. Scoring Defense: 76.3. Figure 70 is the goal, this is a REAL PROBLEM.
3. Field Goal %: 48.8. Figure 47 is a good goal, again we're doing just fine.
4. FG Defense %: 51.9. Figure 40 is the goal (last year we averaged 45) ... this is a HUGE PROBLEM.
5. 3-pt FG/Game: 10.3. Figure 10 is good (last year we averaged 12) ... we're improving with 8, 11, & 12 in each of the 3 past games. We're okay
6. 3-pt FG %: 37. Figure 37 is good (last year we averaged 38.5 ... again, we're okay.
7. Free-Throw %: 60.3. We should be over 75% (last year 75.1%). Another REAL PROBLEM.
8. Rebound Mgn: 4.7. Figure 8 is a goal. We did fine against Belmont & PS, but -14 yesterday. INCONSISTENT.
9. Assists/Game: 17.3 We look for 20, which we hit against Belmont, but only 16 against PS & OD. INCONSISTENT.
10. Turnovers/Gm: 11.7 We look for 10. We're doing better, here, with 16 against Belmont, only 8 against PS and 11 yesterday. We've generally improved since Belmont. Not a problem.

Gang, yes we miss Hunter and Garrison, but the numbers don't lie. It's not their offensive production we're missing, its Defense. Scoring Defense & especially FG% Defense. And what's really annoying is CBR has called-out defense as a goal this year. Watch for coaches to be drilling this into our guys' heads.

And Free-Throw %age. If either of the last two games had come down to free-throws I wouldn't have been optimistic. This is something controllable. Look for add'l emphasis on these basics going forward.

Yes, our offense relies on movement and 3pt shooting, but the numbers reveal this isn't our real problem. It's defense, pure and simple. Go 'Dins.
Nice analysis. It’s all too easy for casual observers like myself to conclude simply “dang we don’t shoot good enough” ….
furpop16 liked this

Recent Topics

User avatar AP Top 25 Poll (Nov. 18th)

by FU Hoopla

Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:18 pm

Default Avatar SOCON THE FINAL WEEK

by gofurman

Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:27 pm

Default Avatar Mercer

by gofurman

Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:19 pm

User avatar @ Charleston Southern (Nov. 23rd)

by cavedweller2

Fri Nov 22, 2024 6:47 pm

Default Avatar Furman vs UNC 11/21 5pm

by Sad Din

Fri Nov 22, 2024 5:30 pm

Twitter

About Us

GoPaladins.com is the latest iteration of The Unofficial Furman Football Page. Launched in August of 1996, The UFFP welcomes fans of all FCS football teams - and fans of the more inferior sports, too - for discussion, cameraderie, and even the occasional smack talk.

For example, Furman has nearly twice as many Southern Conference football championships as the next best SoCon member, and over three times as many as The Citadel....which is why they must carry our luggage

GoPaladins.com is not affiliated with Furman University or its athletics programs.