The Unofficial Furman Football Page

Another lower tier team that lists us as 'Exhibition' so they don't have to count the loss on their record, lame

Crowd size this Friday should be interesting

Loyola defeated IUPUI 85-62 tonight, IUPUI had already won @ South Florida 70-53, we play @ South Florida 12/2


If you use the transitive property we should beat South Florida by about 64

Couple of interesting scores from tonight;
SC Upstate led #2 Louisville 43-40 midway second half before Louisville went on a 36-7 run to end the game.

Elon led a good portion of the game and took UNC to the wire, was within 8 and the ball with 2 mins left losing by 14.

DungeonRealm wrote: ↑

Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:02 pm

Crowd size this Friday should be interesting

Classes are still in session. I see no reason why we wouldn't have our normal D-II/NCCAA crowd of around 1200.

MNORM wrote: ↑

Thu Nov 21, 2019 8:47 am

DungeonRealm wrote: ↑

Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:02 pm

Crowd size this Friday should be interesting

Classes are still in session. I see no reason why we wouldn't have our normal D-II/NCCAA crowd of around 1200.

Last Friday it was much better than 1200, almost 1700.

apaladin wrote: ↑

Thu Nov 21, 2019 10:38 am

MNORM wrote: ↑

Thu Nov 21, 2019 8:47 am

DungeonRealm wrote: ↑

Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:02 pm

Crowd size this Friday should be interesting

Classes are still in session. I see no reason why we wouldn't have our normal D-II/NCCAA crowd of around 1200.

Last Friday it was much better than 1200, almost 1700.

I think that was the best crowd we've had at "play-down" game. Many fellow season ticket holders in my section were commenting on how good the crowd was compared to "play-down" games in past seasons.

Slamma Jamma!

Slamma Jamma!!

Note, Mercer only beat that team by 8

DungeonRealm wrote: ↑

Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:43 pm

Note, Mercer only beat that team by 8

Coach was quite upbeat on the radio extended post-game show, not just because the guys lapped CIU, but I sensed more because the 1-3-1 zone is proving effective. Not that I would know anything about that - hopefully the more X & O savvy among us might care to comment - but Coach said the 2-3 zone (which I gather is the more ubiquitous version) is too passive for his liking. Dan recalled Coach favors man-to-man as it allows the defense to be more aggressive and "get in their faces". CBR has come around as the other coaches & players have convinced him they can play 1-3-1 while maintaining aggressiveness of man-to-man.