Ignoring any greater proceeds from NCAA tourney money ... that's because Furman was too inept to leverage Davidson's success.DungeonRealm wrote: ↑Tue Feb 26, 2019 10:55 amFessor wrote: ↑Tue Feb 26, 2019 9:44 amA rising tide raises all boats.MidlandsPaladin wrote: ↑Tue Feb 26, 2019 7:07 amNOT happy for them...NEVER will be. If we are going to call them our rival, let's start treating them like one.
Do you think they were reveling in our success when we beat Loyola and Nova? If you do, go read a few threads on their board. I'm all about SoCon brotherhood, but let's remember we are not only competing with them on the court (field) but off. I don't wish for anything that gives them an advantage.
What's good for Wofford is good for the SoCon and good for Furman.
I don't remember Davidson's BBall success having a positive impact on Furman BBall?
Wofford
Fessor wrote: ↑Tue Feb 26, 2019 12:01 pmIgnoring any greater proceeds from NCAA tourney money ... that's because Furman was too inept to leverage Davidson's success.DungeonRealm wrote: ↑Tue Feb 26, 2019 10:55 amFessor wrote: ↑Tue Feb 26, 2019 9:44 amA rising tide raises all boats.MidlandsPaladin wrote: ↑Tue Feb 26, 2019 7:07 amNOT happy for them...NEVER will be. If we are going to call them our rival, let's start treating them like one.
Do you think they were reveling in our success when we beat Loyola and Nova? If you do, go read a few threads on their board. I'm all about SoCon brotherhood, but let's remember we are not only competing with them on the court (field) but off. I don't wish for anything that gives them an advantage.
What's good for Wofford is good for the SoCon and good for Furman.
I don't remember Davidson's BBall success having a positive impact on Furman BBall?
That's certainly true
You guys are too nice... 
That's why they put the words "heated", "hated", and "bitter" in front of the word "rival'.
That's why they put the words "heated", "hated", and "bitter" in front of the word "rival'.
