All the QB / Roper people are probably a lil quiet right now. Our D is carrying us- YET. AGAIN.The Jackal wrote: ↑Sat Sep 24, 2022 7:45 pmWestern got deep in Samford territory several times and couldn’t convert touchdowns.
A lot of the game was WCU trading touchdowns for field goals.
That said, samford is playing better defensively than they have in a while. We can’t beat them playing like we did today.
What do you mean by "QB/Roper" people?gofurman wrote: ↑Sat Sep 24, 2022 9:03 pmAll the QB / Roper people are probably a lil quiet right now. Our D is carrying us- YET. AGAIN.The Jackal wrote: ↑Sat Sep 24, 2022 7:45 pmWestern got deep in Samford territory several times and couldn’t convert touchdowns.
A lot of the game was WCU trading touchdowns for field goals.
That said, samford is playing better defensively than they have in a while. We can’t beat them playing like we did today.
PLEASE. SCORE. FURMAN.
We couldn’t complete a pass in the first half. I bet we had what? One or two completions in the first quarter? For an OC and supposedly accurate qb that ain’t cutting it. At all.
Compare. Western Carolina put 52 on CSU. we had what. 24? Now on D, WCu. allowed 38 to CSU. We allowed only 19.
We were objectively better passing vs CLemson than ETSU or CSU ! That’s crazy - CLemson is a little off but cmon. I do wonder if Huff came in a lil hurt
Ehh. Not so fast. CLemsons weak performance vs us (relative to expectations) and then weak performance vs La Tech - relative to expectations- indicated they would struggle vs a decent passing team w more talent. And. They. Did. Today at wake they hit right near the one TD Spread winning in OT. and I’ll go on record - ON RECORD - thst t this CLemson edition is overrated and ain’t doing Shiite in a CFP if they get there. Which they probably don’t. Before anyone says “well that’s an easy pick” - it is a little - but that’s what they were picked preseason by experts… many who PLAYED HIGH LEVEL FOOTBALL !!! (I note that bc you say others who play the have know this. Yet many of those said after us or La Tech CLemson could run table in ACC to CFP. I said no). But let’s see who knows more. Me or them I’m betting on myself. And you can’t say “yeah but you’ve seen them play games..”. According to your theory if you SIMPLY WIN (last week is last week”) you are on to the future. Nope. CLemson ain’t winning a title. Past is indicative of the future. Trevor Lawrence team I could see was winning it all. And they did. Not this edition. But your thing of “as long as you win then you are on to next week and past outcomes mean nothing”. Hmm. Then since tigers are 4-0 you they are least could win em all. NOPE. NOPE. They don’t have it. I can see it. Or lack of it.gman84 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 24, 2022 10:29 pmWhat happened last week is last week. Trying to compare outcomes with common opponents is useless as well. You can not predict what a team will do this week based on a common opponent from 3 weeks ago. Anyone who has ever played the game or has a true understanding of the game knows this. What Samford did previously means squat. The same holds true for FU. The team that plays the most complete game will have the best chance to win next week.
Philosophically, Samford is usually trying to score from outside the red zone. Their offense utilizes the space on the field to operate, and the closer to the goal line, the less space they have. They take a lot of end zone shots from 20-30 yards out.AstroDin wrote: ↑Sun Sep 25, 2022 7:55 amA few takeaways from last year's end-of-the-season match with Samford.
Jace Wilson was 7 of 11 passing for 145 yards and a touchdown. Jace also ran for 31 yards and another score. Roberto had a breakout game rushing for 216 and two scores. Abrams had 110 yards. Furman only had four players catch a pass.
I watched the WCU/Samford game. Western and their coach - lost their sh!t at times in that game - and Samford took advantage. I'm guessing Samford's game plan for Carlos Davis will be noted by the SoCon schools playing WCU. Samford hit him the entire game.
All but one of Samford's scores were 20 yards or more. Samford only rushed for 101 years; 49 were on a touchdown run in the 4th quarter. Chandler Smith appears to be Hiers go to guy.
Why do you say US. I didn’t say you ??? I didn’t. You made an assumption - we know what that does. Never did I say you. NEVERAstroDin wrote: ↑Sun Sep 25, 2022 7:39 amGoFu— you're as predictable as usual.
When the DINS win, you often give back-handed compliments under the caveat of being honest.
When the DINS lose or, as in yesterday's case, have a less than stellar outing and still win. You take on the I told you so and are quick to call out those of us that are more optimistic.
Chill out on calling us Roper Quarterback people, just as you have a right to show up only during football season and be the voice of true honesty. Some of us are on the board year-round.
Unless I was watching another game — our backup QB came in and led the team to its touchdowns and a come-from-behind victory.