Clemson v. Furman in 2025
PostPosted:Mon Apr 02, 2018 8:20 am
http://www.fbschedules.com/2018/03/clem ... ford-2027/
We'll play Clemson now in 2018, 2022, and 2025.
We'll play Clemson now in 2018, 2022, and 2025.
The Unofficial Furman Football Page
https://gopaladins.com/
Excellent. One error in the article is it's not every 4 years. 2022 to 2025 is 3 years.paladinfan12 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 8:20 amhttp://www.fbschedules.com/2018/03/clem ... ford-2027/
We'll play Clemson now in 2018, 2022, and 2025.
May not be as obvious as it seems: if we play Clemson x3 in 8 years, the Gamecocks should be on our schedule sometime in those 8 years; so would that be 2023?apaladin wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 12:42 pmTo recap FBS future FBS games:
2018 Clemson
2019 VPI and Georgia State
2020 Tennessee
2021 NC State
2022 Clemson
2023 TBA
2024 Mississippi
2025 Clemson
So the only year we don't currently have an FBS game is 2023 for the next 8 years. Anyone heard anything for 2023?
I agree, and have stated in the past, that we are getting a bad deal when we play them. * ADDITIONAL INFO OF INTEREST, SEE BELOW ...
I feel like all of us are like broked records on here.
Why should USC not pay as well as other schools? Why should they not pay at least as much as Clemson does?paladinfan12 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 8:34 amI feel like all of us are like broked records on here.
The Gamecocks do not pay as well as other schools, but the reason our payout was so much less back in 2010 when we played them was because when the contract was signed while the NCAA rules stated FCS games do not count toward your 6 wins for bowl eligibility.
If South Carolina was willing to pay upwards of $400K for a game that the school could do in a day trip I think it would be a great game for 2023. This year South Carolina is paying Chattanooga $400K for their game.
Because under the previous athletic leadership, they could take advantage of us. It’s as much our fault as theirs.affirm wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 11:11 amWhy should USC not pay as well as other schools? Why should they not pay at least as much as Clemson does?paladinfan12 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 8:34 amI feel like all of us are like broked records on here.
The Gamecocks do not pay as well as other schools, but the reason our payout was so much less back in 2010 when we played them was because when the contract was signed while the NCAA rules stated FCS games do not count toward your 6 wins for bowl eligibility.
If South Carolina was willing to pay upwards of $400K for a game that the school could do in a day trip I think it would be a great game for 2023. This year South Carolina is paying Chattanooga $400K for their game.
Exactly. If we were willing to sell at fire sale prices, why should any school pay more for a game than they have to?gman wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:08 pmBecause under the previous athletic leadership, they could take advantage of us. It’s as much our fault as theirs.affirm wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 11:11 amWhy should USC not pay as well as other schools? Why should they not pay at least as much as Clemson does?paladinfan12 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 04, 2018 8:34 amI feel like all of us are like broked records on here.
The Gamecocks do not pay as well as other schools, but the reason our payout was so much less back in 2010 when we played them was because when the contract was signed while the NCAA rules stated FCS games do not count toward your 6 wins for bowl eligibility.
If South Carolina was willing to pay upwards of $400K for a game that the school could do in a day trip I think it would be a great game for 2023. This year South Carolina is paying Chattanooga $400K for their game.