The Unofficial Furman Football Page
https://gopaladins.com/
Although the “mandatory” part would not be the right idea, I like the move by Napier to encourage the greatest possible participation by scholarship athletes in the support organization. It should be done at Furman. And it should not be zero cost to those who join, but at least some amount, even if only $10 per year. And it should not be a lifetime reduced annual amount for membership post-graduation - though certainly post-graduation membership should be sought, encouraged, and received.FUBeAR wrote: ↑Fri Aug 16, 2019 5:54 pmWhile at FU, appreciative of all the Paladin Club was doing for him, FUBeAR pawned his gold HS class ring to get $50 so that he could donate it to....
...buy a keg. Ain’t no way that fi’ty was goin’ to the PC. Young men must have priorities, y’know!
Not sure about today’s Players, but back in the day, we were all dead broke all the time.
FRIEND-raising must precede fundraising.
Although the “mandatory” part would not be the right idea, I like the move by Napier to encourage the greatest possible participation by scholarship athletes in the support organization. It should be done at Furman. And it should not be zero cost to those who join, but at least some amount, even if only $10 per year. And it should not be a lifetime reduced annual amount for membership post-graduation - though certainly post-graduation membership should be sought, encouraged, and received.FUBeAR wrote: ↑Fri Aug 16, 2019 5:54 pmWhile at FU, appreciative of all the Paladin Club was doing for him, FUBeAR pawned his gold HS class ring to get $50 so that he could donate it to....
...buy a keg. Ain’t no way that fi’ty was goin’ to the PC. Young men must have priorities, y’know!
Not sure about today’s Players, but back in the day, we were all dead broke all the time.
FRIEND-raising must precede fundraising.
Just guessin’ - Sales/Marketing - not your career choice?affirm wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 9:38 amAlthough the “mandatory” part would not be the right idea, I like the move by Napier to encourage the greatest possible participation by scholarship athletes in the support organization. It should be done at Furman. And it should not be zero cost to those who join, but at least some amount, even if only $10 per year. And it should not be a lifetime reduced annual amount for membership post-graduation - though certainly post-graduation membership should be sought, encouraged, and received.FUBeAR wrote: ↑Fri Aug 16, 2019 5:54 pmWhile at FU, appreciative of all the Paladin Club was doing for him, FUBeAR pawned his gold HS class ring to get $50 so that he could donate it to....
...buy a keg. Ain’t no way that fi’ty was goin’ to the PC. Young men must have priorities, y’know!
Not sure about today’s Players, but back in the day, we were all dead broke all the time.
FRIEND-raising must precede fundraising.
Scholarship athletes do and should indicate some definite personal awareness of and support for the funding of athletics programs at Furman - not just what they individually give in practice, competition, travel, physical output, injury, pain, effort, engagement, etc. (Recently, I read that Bucknell had 100% participation of all their graduating scholar athletes this year. I like that.)
snideFUBeAR wrote: ↑Mon Aug 19, 2019 11:58 amJust guessin’ - Sales/Marketing - not your career choice?affirm wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 9:38 amAlthough the “mandatory” part would not be the right idea, I like the move by Napier to encourage the greatest possible participation by scholarship athletes in the support organization. It should be done at Furman. And it should not be zero cost to those who join, but at least some amount, even if only $10 per year. And it should not be a lifetime reduced annual amount for membership post-graduation - though certainly post-graduation membership should be sought, encouraged, and received.FUBeAR wrote: ↑Fri Aug 16, 2019 5:54 pmWhile at FU, appreciative of all the Paladin Club was doing for him, FUBeAR pawned his gold HS class ring to get $50 so that he could donate it to....
...buy a keg. Ain’t no way that fi’ty was goin’ to the PC. Young men must have priorities, y’know!
Not sure about today’s Players, but back in the day, we were all dead broke all the time.
FRIEND-raising must precede fundraising.
Scholarship athletes do and should indicate some definite personal awareness of and support for the funding of athletics programs at Furman - not just what they individually give in practice, competition, travel, physical output, injury, pain, effort, engagement, etc. (Recently, I read that Bucknell had 100% participation of all their graduating scholar athletes this year. I like that.)
Why “snide?” The world needs Actuaries too, y’know.affirm wrote: ↑Mon Aug 19, 2019 12:53 pmsnideFUBeAR wrote: ↑Mon Aug 19, 2019 11:58 amJust guessin’ - Sales/Marketing - not your career choice?affirm wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 9:38 amAlthough the “mandatory” part would not be the right idea, I like the move by Napier to encourage the greatest possible participation by scholarship athletes in the support organization. It should be done at Furman. And it should not be zero cost to those who join, but at least some amount, even if only $10 per year. And it should not be a lifetime reduced annual amount for membership post-graduation - though certainly post-graduation membership should be sought, encouraged, and received.FUBeAR wrote: ↑Fri Aug 16, 2019 5:54 pmWhile at FU, appreciative of all the Paladin Club was doing for him, FUBeAR pawned his gold HS class ring to get $50 so that he could donate it to....
...buy a keg. Ain’t no way that fi’ty was goin’ to the PC. Young men must have priorities, y’know!
Not sure about today’s Players, but back in the day, we were all dead broke all the time.
FRIEND-raising must precede fundraising.
Scholarship athletes do and should indicate some definite personal awareness of and support for the funding of athletics programs at Furman - not just what they individually give in practice, competition, travel, physical output, injury, pain, effort, engagement, etc. (Recently, I read that Bucknell had 100% participation of all their graduating scholar athletes this year. I like that.)