• Article ( QB discussion)

 #14935  by THPaladin
 Tue Jul 23, 2019 12:36 pm
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.greenv ... 1793339001

Good article. My take..... it all comes down to three weeks in August. If Shiflett picks up offense and performs he will be for sure in the mix and could be the starter when we get into conference play. May see multiple QBs initially. Grainger is leader going into camp . If it appears Shiflett will not be QB at some point in season I bet he plays some at WR. Assuming all are healthy by end of season Grainger or Shiflett will move to another position if one of them is the clear starter. Not discounting Sisson at all... he could be solid and appears to be more of a game manager. Grainger (if he improves in the turnover area) and if Shiflett gets command of offense each have potential to be a more of a game changer type of QB. From the little I have heard ( and Hendrix alluded to it in article) Shiflett is super athletic with excellent speed and quickness. It will be fun see how it all plays out. I don’t think we will have a clear cut starter until October assuming no injuries.
 #14937  by THPaladin
 Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:08 pm
Mercer September 21. We will have one by then but don’t be surprised if multiple qbs are used. Just my opinion
 #15030  by apaladin
 Sun Jul 28, 2019 12:39 pm
From Scott Keeler's report: In two-plus seasons at Northwest Whitfield High (Class 4A), Shiflett threw for more than 5,000 yards and 52 touchdowns and rushed for more than 2,000 yards and 25 touchdowns. As a senior in 2018, he was his region's player of the year in football and basketball.

Pretty impressive stats, over 7,000 yds, of offense and 77 TD's. Didn't realize he was his regions player of the year in both football and basketball. Must be a pretty darn good athlete. Anxious to see how this QB battle will go. Hope to attend a few practices unless they practice at 6AM, then I am out, LOL.
Rokawaylifer liked this
 #15037  by The Jackal
 Sun Jul 28, 2019 10:08 pm
apaladin wrote:
Sun Jul 28, 2019 12:39 pm
From Scott Keeler's report: In two-plus seasons at Northwest Whitfield High (Class 4A), Shiflett threw for more than 5,000 yards and 52 touchdowns and rushed for more than 2,000 yards and 25 touchdowns. As a senior in 2018, he was his region's player of the year in football and basketball.

Pretty impressive stats, over 7,000 yds, of offense and 77 TD's. Didn't realize he was his regions player of the year in both football and basketball. Must be a pretty darn good athlete. Anxious to see how this QB battle will go. Hope to attend a few practices unless they practice at 6AM, then I am out, LOL.
It's always good that if you are going to discuss someone's writing, put a link to the article.

http://www.furmansportsreport.com/2019/ ... polls.html
 #15040  by The Jackal
 Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:16 am
FUpaladin08 wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2019 9:38 am
I’m hoping Shiflett picks it up quick and becomes a Chris Forcier type QB for us. Excited what any QB will be able to do with the OL in front.
I've noticed three things in reading pre-season interviews with Clay Hendrix:

1. Furman has put a lot of work in this summer. I truly expect that we will have the biggest, fastest, fittest team we've seen in years.

2. Hendrix at least appears to be unconcerned with the QB situation. He notes we have a lot more talent this year than in years' past, and that they know what these young guys are capable of. As I've argued before, the best thing you can do for a young QB is stick him behind a veteran OL, give him a strong running game, and support them with a strong defense and kicking game. None of these guys are going to have to carry this team.

3. For the first time since taking the job, Hendrix isn't talking about how thin we are at certain positions. That used to be a staple of every interview - youth and depth.
FUKA61, FUpaladin08, Jasper liked this
 #15044  by Jasper
 Mon Jul 29, 2019 3:47 pm
I don't expect Shiflet to be an impact player at QB in the immediate future. CCH has indicated that he will certainly be given an opportunity to compete for the job but Clay is focusing on having 2 QB's ready for our first game in a touch more than 4 weeks from now. He has 3 players who have been in the system for a full year and know it well so I have to think he is focusing on that group, with Grainger and Sisson being the leading candidates for his efforts. If Shiflet is as good an athlete and QB as his history indicates, that will surely become apparent in time but I don't think it will be for Week One. Remember, it took Forcier a long time to actually get on the field.
FUBeAR liked this
 #15047  by gofurman
 Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:32 pm
The Jackal wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:16 am
FUpaladin08 wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2019 9:38 am
I’m hoping Shiflett picks it up quick and becomes a Chris Forcier type QB for us. Excited what any QB will be able to do with the OL in front.
I've noticed three things in reading pre-season interviews with Clay Hendrix:

1. Furman has put a lot of work in this summer. I truly expect that we will have the biggest, fastest, fittest team we've seen in years.

2. Hendrix at least appears to be unconcerned with the QB situation. He notes we have a lot more talent this year than in years' past, and that they know what these young guys are capable of. As I've argued before, the best thing you can do for a young QB is stick him behind a veteran OL, give him a strong running game, and support them with a strong defense and kicking game. None of these guys are going to have to carry this team.

3. For the first time since taking the job, Hendrix isn't talking about how thin we are at certain positions. That used to be a staple of every interview - youth and depth.
Agree w most of this. Two positions we are still thin or young at .. QB (deep but really young) and Strong Safety - some talk of a freshman possibly making some starts there.
 #15048  by apaladin
 Mon Jul 29, 2019 11:33 pm
The season will be unique. I doubt we have ever started a season where all the QB's on the team have so little game experience. Grainger had all of that. All QB's are virtually in the same year(R-Fr or Soph), so second year for all. No junior or senior QB's.
 #15051  by The Jackal
 Tue Jul 30, 2019 6:22 am
apaladin wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2019 11:33 pm
The season will be unique. I doubt we have ever started a season where all the QB's on the team have so little game experience. Grainger had all of that. All QB's are virtually in the same year(R-Fr or Soph), so second year for all. No junior or senior QB's.
In 2018 (just last year) we had Harris Roberts, Darren Grainger, and Hamp Sisson. Roberts had, to that point, basically only played mop up duty, had never started, and had 14 career pass attempts.

In 2012 we had Dakota Derrick and Reese Hannon. Hannon was a true freshman and Derrick had played sparingly as a backup.

In 2010, we went in with Chris Forcier (who was lost early in the season to injury) and then played with Cody Worley, who had seen sporadic mop-up duty.

In 2006, we had Renaldo Gray and Jordan Sorrells. Sorrells was a freshman and Gray, a converted running back, had seen little time as Ingle Martin's backup.

In 2003, we had Bo Moore and Josh Stepp. Moore was a little-used backup to Billy Napier (and, admittedly, more suited as a punter). Stepp was a freshman.
FUpaladin08 liked this
 #15052  by The Jackal
 Tue Jul 30, 2019 8:48 am
A few other things:

First, if this was any other year in recent college football, Grainger would be classified as a sophomore (the redshirt rules changed in 2018). So, while yes, he is technically a freshman, he'd historically been classified as a sophomore this season. If Furman's likely starter was a sophomore who saw significant time playing as a freshman, would there be so much handwringing?

Furman did not heavily go after a QB in the 2019 class. They had a few targets early on, but you did not even see reports of offers to QBs for most of last year and through the recruiting period. If Furman was concerned over the QB position, I imagine you would have seen a lot more scholarship offers out to QBs (which you are seeing for the 2020 class).

The rumors prior to Jemar Lincoln's departure was that he was being asked to move to safety. Again, if you are concerned about QB depth and experience, you don't take your most veteran QB remaining on the roster and move him to defensive back.

I don't know the timeline, but I assume that Shiflett took the scholarship spot vacated by Lincoln. Shiflett was known to our staff (they recruited him in high school), he is athletic, versatile, and can play a number of positions. I don't think they added him to the roster because of a concern at QB, but more as a guy that can really help us out on offense. I don't know the answer, but if Lincoln doesn't transfer, maybe Shiflett isn't a Paladin.

Young QBs are a part of college football. Every team every few years has to break in guys without much experience. This isn't the NFL where one QB can stay for 10-15 years with one team. In college guys move on and they have to be replaced with guys with less experience.
 #15053  by Paul C
 Tue Jul 30, 2019 9:57 am
Jackal - I don't care if Grainger is a R-Fr or a Soph, I'd be equally concerned. Not to rehash the arguments made but regardless of his classification he's raw, inexperienced, and full of potential.

Agree with the point about Lincoln, if he was the answer they wouldn't have tried to get him to switch positions. And also agree that any decent QB we'd have recruited would have been scared away by the depth chart....so smart to save that QB spot for this year's class.

And I like where we are at QB...rarely, if ever, have we had 3 QB's with the potential and/or pedigree of Grainger, Sisson and Shiflett on the roster at the same time. It's just that unless Grainger has made some big steps in the offseason (which is very very possible) we might still have to endure some growing pains at the most important position on the field. The good news is that all 3 of them have 4 more years in the program (if Shiflett RS's this year).

So hopefully this is the last year for some time that we have this offseason concern...
fufanatic, FUKA61 liked this
 #15054  by apaladin
 Tue Jul 30, 2019 10:57 am
Agree with PC. Regardless of the arguments this season is unique and we have never entered the season without a QB being in the program more than a year.
 #15057  by The Jackal
 Tue Jul 30, 2019 11:59 am
apaladin wrote:
Tue Jul 30, 2019 10:57 am
Agree with PC. Regardless of the arguments this season is unique and we have never entered the season without a QB being in the program more than a year.
I guess I just don't get all the teeth gnashing.

Yeah, sure, it'd be great to be returning a redshirt Junior All American at QB. We don't have that. Most teams don't. Samford returned the nation's best offensive player at QB and finished 5th in conference play. A lot of good it did them.

UGA started true freshmen QBs in 2016 and 2017. They played in the national title game in 2017.

Young QBs are part of the game. I'd be a heckuva lot more worried if we had an experienced QB and lacked a veteran OL, strong defense, or lacked a running game.

These QBs will have more talent around them than probably any Furman QB since Ingle Martin.

Recent Topics

Default Avatar Mercer

by The Jackal

Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:38 am

Default Avatar Mercer

by The Jackal

Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:19 am

User avatar vs. Seattle (Nov. 26th Las Vegas)

by apaladin

Mon Nov 25, 2024 2:00 am

User avatar AP Top 25 Hoops Poll

by FU Hoopla

Sun Nov 24, 2024 9:26 pm

Twitter

About Us

GoPaladins.com is the latest iteration of The Unofficial Furman Football Page. Launched in August of 1996, The UFFP welcomes fans of all FCS football teams - and fans of the more inferior sports, too - for discussion, cameraderie, and even the occasional smack talk.

For example, Furman has nearly twice as many Southern Conference football championships as the next best SoCon member, and over three times as many as The Citadel....which is why they must carry our luggage

GoPaladins.com is not affiliated with Furman University or its athletics programs.