cavedweller2 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 17, 2022 9:40 amGive credit where credit is due. Western is up and coming. They have some serious speed and I liked the look of that Freshman QB. Offenses in college football are progressing faster than the defenses can keep up. Look at the number of track meets/shoot outs with 40 + points on Saturday. It am pure horror show!
So, I certainly think from what I saw Saturday that WCU clearly had some serious speed, size, and depth at WR. Hendrix mentioned that in the pre-game, and it was pretty obvious in the game that they were a real offensive problem.
WCU has put up yards on everyone. Where they struggle is in scoring in the red zone where their vertical routes and speed are somewhat mitigated by the shortened field. We just kept playing right into what they do well offensively.
As I have thought more about it, I think that the style of defense we are trying to run is a more high pressure style with a lot of cover-3. To some degree, that is going to cost us every now and again. It's going to lead to more defensive turnovers. Both of those things have been true this year.
It strikes me that Saturday we didn't make a lot of adjustments to accommodate for WCU's size and speed at receiver. If our young CBs are struggling with covering their vertical routes, we need to give them help. On the long TD on the slant route, we had no apparent inside help - basically the WR just had to beat the man to the inside and then he was going to run for a while.
Our staff is going to rotate defensive players. While our CBs are talented, most of them are sophomores (Robinson, Yates, Morris). Best I could tell, WCU was making a concerted effort not to throw the ball anywhere near Travis Blackshear. In most of these long passes, they were picking on our younger DBs who were frequently left without safety help.
Bottom line, I don't think we made enough adjustments on defense to accommodate for what WCU was throwing at us.