FUBeAR wrote: ↑Mon Nov 07, 2022 11:43 am
The Jackal wrote: ↑Mon Nov 07, 2022 10:21 am
I had a nice long write up about Mercer's defense.
Then my computer reset.
HATE that…You get a nice piece typed up, go to another tab to check a stat and the whole thing disappears!!
I’ve started trying to remember to Copy to clipboard before I ‘leave,’ but if I’m trying to bring over a link or some data I want to copy/paste, that doesn’t work. On AGS, when I preview, it locks it in…so I don’t lose it and the reply function has an AutoSave & Restore feature turned on. Oh well…could always compose in Notes and copy to here. #MessageBoardProbs
If you get motivated to redo that post, FUBeAR will look forward to reading it.
30,000 foot view.
Mercer technically lists itself as a "multiple" defense. Watching them, though, they look like a base 4-2-5, which is not super common in SoCon football.
They look to be essentially a one gap - read/react scheme. The six man box tries to fill every gap and spill everything to their two strong safeties (which I think they call ROVER and BANDIT).
Furman needs to be ready for the aggressive downhill attack. Mercer's defensive front is quick and they come up the field hard.
However, the Paladins
may create some matchup issues for the Bears defensive front.
1. RPO - one response to the 4-2-5 set is the RPO (a response to the defense's response to the spread, if you will). With linebackers reading and reacting quickly to fill gaps, there can be space left behind for the play action game. Furman is one of the SoCon's better RPO teams.
The attacking defense really limits a teams ability to really throw slower developing downfield plays. Furman doesn't do much of that however. A lot of the Paladin passing game has the ball out quick.
2. TE mismatches. A six man box is going to leave some space in the middle and allows an offense to exploit a mismatch with the TE. Furman, of course, has a really good TE and likes to throw the ball to the middle of the field.
3. QB run. Expect Furman to use formations to anticipate Mercer's defensive alignment and then use Huff as a runner backside with either a pulling OG or RB as a kick out.
4. Bully Ball. UTC had some pretty solid success with their running backs against Mercer's defensive front, with a lot of yards coming after contact. With gap assignments, the scheme is susceptible to bigger plays in the run game if the back can get through that first wave of defenders (there's not many guys left at the second level).
Mercer's defense wants to be quick and aggressive. It doesn't surprise me after noting the DC has a Citadel pedigree. Furman might be able to counteract that some by playing a little bully ball and using their two big backs to pound the defensive interior and force Mercer to drop their third safety into the box.
It's going to be a war inside the tackles, though.