apaladin wrote:UIW is one of the worst possible matchups for Furman. Their QB has thrown for 3,767 yds 50 TD’s and only 4 ints. They have a 1,000 yd receiver. They have a 1,000 yd RB that averages 7.1 ypc. Granted their schedule is suspect but these are video game type numbers. They did put up 55 points and 616 yds on FBS Nevada. Nevada finished 2-10 but the 55 points was the most Nevada gave up all year. They have scored over 50 points in 6 of their 11 games, over 60 twice and over 70 twice.
They're the seventh seed...Furman had to play one of the top 8 teams.
I think this is a good match up. A team putting up video game numbers against questionable opponents to me is a glorified Mercer. They're untested against a compotent defence, compotent coaching staff, etc.
I thought Elon's offense could exploit Furman's defense's weak points. Sure, Furman is good against run first teams BUT Elon had a mobile qb with a super high passing efficiency and a BIG O-line. Furman's defense is set up to shut down the run, disrupt the passer, and be opportunistic on the backend when said passer is pressured. I was not confident that we could disrupt the passing game given Elon's O-line and mobile qb and said qb was capable of beating us with his arm.
I'm REALLY happy with the bracket. Furman had to start with one of the best teams they could of drawn for the first round BUT since Furman won we move on to an untested team in Texas and if Furman wins that we move onto California. We don't have to play in the far North against one of the teams with some of the biggest home field advantages in the FCS until we play NDSU in the semi-finals.
I know Elon was a tough draw for the first round but good god watching Elon, who thought they were too good to play in the SoCon, beaten like a drum felt good. They still don't have a win in the play-offs and half of that is thanks to Furman.